Monster Energy Drink Belly Button Ring

Uganda: Governance concerned

Uganda is one of the most beautiful countries in the world and its rich agricultural and mineral potential is considerable. By its magnificence, by its variety of forms and its colors, by the profusion of life, its vegetation, its birds and its wildlife, Uganda is truly the pearl of Africa ". With these words Winston Churchill described Uganda in 1908.

Often presented as a model for development in Africa, the former "Pearl of Africa" British voting today to elect (reelect?) President. The opportunity to propose a series of posts here on this country still unknown francophones.
Uganda, because of its location at the intersection of the Horn of Africa Great Lakes and Central Africa, at an intersection where cross connections with other parts of the continent is an important geostrategic area. The new strategic environment that emerged after September 11 has highlighted the particular strengths of this region is also a rear base observation of Sudan and the Horn of Africa.

One factor that pushes weight to the success of the Ugandan model is its political volatility. The country has long been deprived of political parties and the opposition was composed of individuals who spoke in Parliament.

support from donors has not been economic. They accepted the system of democracy "unbiased" in the 1995 Constitution. Museveni regarded the parties as to the origin of all the ills experienced by this country, as designed by "sectarian politicians" who have transformed into vectors of their clan interests.
IT is true that Uganda has long borne the brunt of a "geography of war" (obsession with the territory). The nature of the state is at the heart of conflict and we will return in a future post.
Faced with irregularities, funders are now implementing a policy of conditionality placing the demilitarization regime in the center of the prior discussions. However, the authority is aware of the importance of Uganda's strategy of Western powers including the United States, and makes no cases of these pressures, especially as a break might help destabilize the country. The country appears as an oasis of stability in the arc of crisis that goes from Somalia in the Sahel. It is still seen as the vector of a Pax Americana in the region. We can also interpret his participation in AMISOM (5200 men) or the formation of Somali soldiers on its territory by an EU mission (EUTM Somalia) as Uganda will become indispensable in the region even if This intervention also involved a strategy of internal occupation troops .

The reputation of good governance of the Ugandan government is seriously questioned for several reasons:

• The level of corruption (127th in the ranking of Transparency International). Some links corruption to the fact that the company and officials have long had to move from state to survive, creating the Magendo which is the local informal economy. To fight against this corruption, the state has created a body of state control, independent, in the framework of the constitution of 1995, the Inspector General of Government (IGG)

• Increase recurrent military spending. The army continues to play a role active in civil affairs of the State;

Moreover, the political system, long locked by President Museveni seems to open but this opening is a trompe l'oeil. Indeed, President Museveni led Uganda for over twenty years. A re dum held in July 2005 endorsed the initiative as a promise of multiparty political openness. In fact, the multi was traded by the president against the possibility to seek a new mandate. In the last presidential elections in February 2006, the first multiparty since the accession to power of Museveni, the presidential candidate has faced a real political battle despite failing in the spirit of multiparty politics. Rejecting the possibility of defeat, M useveni has the state apparatus in the service of his campaign and therefore incur a lawsuit against Kizza Besigye (photo), his rival, to ensure his victory. He was reelected with 60% of the votes after an election campaign that disadvantages the opposition parties. Kizza Besigye, won 37% of the vote finally. Movement retains two-thirds majority in parliament (202 MPs out of 308). The main Ugandan opposition party, Forum for Democratic Change (FDC) of Besigye has threatened to reject the final results of the elections alleging "serious irregularities", including the lack of media coverage of the electoral process and voter intimidation before and during elections. Pressure from donors were not without effect on the outcome of the trial Besigye and the openness to the multiparty system.
The President must now contend with an opposition official, who has local and relays in the population. For these elections, Besigye oppose for the third consecutive time at the side of Museveni 6 other candidates.